Appellant filed the restoration application. The Respondent has not filed the counter affidavit till date.

(ii) In view of the fact that the entry No. 64 was passed on the basis of oral sale, whether the Courts below have erred in holding that the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to decide the legality or ...

i) The learned Special Judge vide order dated 13th June, 2018 dismissed the application on the ground of tenability and jurisdiction to decide the said application to deal with civil liability as ...

The Karnataka High Court upheld a trial court order discharging a public servant of graft charges under the Prevention of ...

KIRPAL SINGH Vs GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI & ORS. Dated: November 21,2024. Secretary, Irrigation Dept. 2008 (7) SCC 169. (supra).

i. The NHAI shall deposit 50 per cent of the compensation amount, as awarded by the Arbitral Court, with the Executing Court within a period of four weeks. The said amount shall be released to the ...

In a recent decision in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Permission as sought for is granted. List the matter before this Bench on 08.01.2024 ...

Learned counsel for appellants would submit that, whatever allegations are made about demand, is not illegal demand towards any dowry. According to him, demand was towards customary rituals which are ...

Thus, although Section 52 of the Act 1882 does not render a transfer pendente lite void yet the court while exercising contempt jurisdiction may be justified to pass directions either for reversal of ...

Section 376D and Section 342 of the Indian Penal Code. The Nachna, District Jaisalmer, Rajasthan. District and Sessions Judge, Pokaran (Jaisalmer). 7. The prosecution has examined one witness so far.

This matter was called on for hearing today. Mr. Abhikalp Pratap Singh. 8. With the above order, I.A. No.208763/2024 stands disposed of.