President Donald Trump's nominees to run the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration are part of a group of scientists censored during the COVID-19 pandemic who are ...

It's a good sign that the president is calling on critics of the federal government's lack of transparency to staff his ...

The journal’s editorial board includes multiple scientists, such as Trump health nominees Jay Bhattacharya and Marty Makary, ...

Most of his health picks are uninterested in using most of the tools that can limit the spread of infectious disease.

The planned $4 billion cut for funding for scientific inquiry to the nation’s universities and academic medical institutions ...

The grants have been the source of new treatments for cancer, heart disease, diabetes, strokes and H.I.V.; wonder drugs like ...

Journal of the Academy of Public Health, whose founders include NIH and FDA nominees, goes against the grain with paid peer review, transparency, absence of gatekeeping. Critics call it a "grift," ...

To protect the eminence of U.S. biomedical research and its own researchers, Stanford must oppose the nomination of Jay ...

The National Institutes of Health says the cuts will save more than $4 billion a year, but critics say it puts potentially lifesaving research in jeopardy.

Public trust in government edicts that are ostensibly science-based has sunk to new lows, and the regulated have become leery ...