The motion to dismiss fraud, forgery and conspiracy charges is based on Arizona’s anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) law, which since 2022 has barred prosecutors from bringing ...
A federal judge has sided with a former Bucks County Corrections officers who says the county fired him for exercising his ...
Trump’s actions and rhetoric have served as a lightning rod of constitutional controversy, drawing concern from First ...
A federal jury on Friday ruled in favor of a former Metro fire captain, awarding him $1.7 million in damages in a free speech ...
A California health clinic sued the state's attorney general last year for pursuing false advertising claims against an ...
Mary Beth and John Tinker continue to add their historic voices to discussions about student speech and First Amendment rights. The Tinker siblings have a unique vantage point: They were two of ...
On June 16, 2023, U.S. District Judge David Nuffer sided with the Southern Utah Drag Stars, calling St. George’s actions an ...
We periodically test and retest the limits of free speech – in effect, revisiting the legal and societal implications of that old childhood refrain, “sticks and stones may break my bones, ...
In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll., 600 U.S. 181 (2023), the Supreme Court all but ended affirmative ...
It is too much to hope that one executive will change the constitutional awareness of the executive branch’s unelected actors. But change must begin somewhere.
Here's what readers had to say about two school board members using alias Facebook pages to express their views on the ...
3d
India Today on MSNWhy a troubled Nehru restricted free speech with first amendment of ConstitutionIt was in 1951 that India's first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, amended the Constitution for the first time, because the ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results